🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an observance that started out as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate gatherings where individuals of African heritage are paid to talk to Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The surge has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since its inception, focusing less on the narratives of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and greater focus on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the month is commemorated is a indication of the political moment. How it progresses is a instructive case in how co-option leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels empowered to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are surging in Europe as a whole.

In the United States, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the state. A drive to scrub the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how little it can be impactful if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the situation of the current era. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is required. A university professor, a prof at a learning establishment, put it best when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a urge to just do away with events including Black History Month altogether, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an period that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an infrastructure that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed through the year (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from political issues, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What value has mere awareness of the past when it ignores the present reality of far-right rallies in the street? Establishments who mark it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to subtle slights, but confronted with the dangers that affect everyone if anti-racism is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and adaptive. Perhaps an complete renaming is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.